Ethics Governance
Ethics & Governance - Resources and Articles
Articles indexes: a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | i | j | k | l | m | n | o | p | q | r | s | t | u | v | w | x | y | z | other


Article - Abstract. To view full article click on the article title.  

eMJA: Daniel et al, Patients' complaints about medical practice
Patients' complaints about medical practice Ann E Daniel, Raymond J Burn and Stefan Horarik MJA 1999; 170: 598-602 Objectives: To survey complainants' experience and the outcome of lodging a complaint about medical treatment. Design and setting: Random sample survey. A 32-item questionnaire was sent to 500 complainants by the New South Wales Health Care Complaints Commission (HCCC), and responses were returned reply-paid to the university. Participants: 290 people with complaints finalised by the HCCC between February 1996 and August 1997. Outcome measures: Profile of complainants and doctor involved; type and place of incident; complainants' emotions at the time of the incident and at the conclusion of the complaints process; outcome of complaint, and satisfaction with outcome and intention to take further action. Results: After excluding non-medical complaints, 290 of 314 questionnaires returned were analysed, giving a response rate of 63% (314/500): 64% of complaints were about clinical care, and the remainder related to rudeness or poor communication (22%), and unethical or improper behaviour (14%); 70% of complainants were women, and 44% of complaints were on behalf of another person; Complainants had a high socioeconomic status, and 60% were currently in paid employment; More than half the incidents occurred in doctors' consulting rooms; 87% of the doctors involved were men, and over half were general practitioners. 37% of complaints were dismissed; 21% of complainants did not know the outcome of their complaint, and 40% believed that the doctor had been disciplined.

Full Article: http://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/jun21/daniel/daniel.html

2006 Ethics-Governance.com